Thursday 17 August 2017

Time Travel

Time travel has always been a thing of the imagination, encouraged by hundreds upon thousands of science fiction TV shows, movies and books. But what is time travel? Surely everyone is travelling through time, just at the same linear rate, with everyone else. What people want is the time travel that Doctor Who and Star Trek exhibit: the almost instant change of time, on a select object, both backwards and forwards on the timeline.
Travelling backwards in time has always been a conundrum for theoretical physicists; it creates paradoxes. The best example for this is the Grandfather Paradox, where you travel back in time and murder your grandfather before he meets your grandmother. Then, since one of your parents are not born neither are you. You would never have existed to create the time machine, so your grandfather lives which means you murder him and the cycle repeats – creating a paradox. This renders the possibility of time travel to the past impossible; or rather not impossible, it would just end the universe, time, and space. There are theories that once the time traveller murders his grandfather he joins a parallel timeline, or an alternate universe, of which he was never born. Other paradoxes such as the autoinfanticide paradox (travelling back in time and murdering oneself as an infant) present the same message: travelling backwards in time is unachievable.
Going forward in time is easily achievable, because everyone is doing it. Going faster than everyone else, however, is slightly more difficult, but possible. According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, gravity, affects both space and time. This means mass drags on time, slowing time down. Artificial satellites prove this, where they gain one-third-of-a-billionth of a second every day, compared to Earth. This is due to their distance away from a large mass, thus gravity does not drag on time as much on them. To the theory into practise, the largest known mass in the Milky Way is the centre black hole Sagittarius A. It has the mass of four million suns in one dense point. If a spacecraft had the ability to orbit this supermassive black hole, it would experience half as much time as on Earth. So if you had trillions of dollars to spend and a death wish, you could visit this Sagittarius A for five years and ten years would have passed on Earth. So travelling faster in time is possible, it just takes a lot of time.
A much more efficient way of travelling faster in time is to go at almost the speed of light. Reaching the speed of light is impossible, as shown by Einstein, and, because of this, strange anomalies occur when you get close to 300 million m/s, such as the slowing down of time. If, somehow, a train was built to circle the Earth, and get 99.999% of light speed, it would slow down. The train’s speed wouldn’t slow, but time would, meaning everyone on board would be going slower than everyone outside the train. The passengers wouldn’t notice a difference, but if they were on that train for 1 year, 223 years would have passed for everyone else on Earth. However, the implications of living on a train moving at near-light speed for 1 year are a much larger problem. Food and water would quickly run out, and ordering at a McDonald’s Drive-Thru isn’t capable at 299 million m/s.
Jumping through time is a different problem altogether. There is only one real possibility of time jumping being attainable, and this is the Einstein-Rosen Bridge; a wormhole. Imagine space as a sine wave. Time and space travels the curve, take the long route. Wormholes open up a possibility of going straight through the wave taking a much shorter route. The only way to penetrate through the metaphorical sine wave is when two incredibly large masses push against it, such as the case of a supermassive black hole. Theoretically, if anything would be enter this black hole, it would go through each point, and come out of the other side. It would have travelled through time and space.Although not seen before by astrophysicists, the equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes, so they are a possibility. One theory by Stephen Hawking is that these wormholes exist in quantum foam, the smallest environment in the universe.In the simplest of terms, quantum foam is the foundation of the fabric of the Universe, smaller than anything else known to man. These tiny wormholes flash in and out of existence, but momentarily link separate places and times in the universe. As theorised by Stephen Hawking, if it was possible to control and enlarge these wormholes, humans would be able to travel through space and time.
In reality, these are only dreams. Any possibility of these theories being tested in the next century, let alone in our lifetime, remain simply as hopes. However, no one knows when a breakthrough may occur like harnessing the energy to control wormholes, or when the answers suddenly become clear. The great thing about time is that, however permanent the past may be, the future is open to anything.

Wednesday 29 March 2017

Northern Irexit

With Brexit in an ever-looming state, it seems inevitable the country will circle back to its favourite and most controversial issue: Northern Ireland. Since 1997 and the Good Friday Agreement, signed in by Blair, the Northern Ireland has seen significant improvements in both relations with the mainland and its adjoining Republic. However, Brexit may forecast a collapse in this amnesty.

The first issue, the biggest issue, that a Brexit UK faces is citizenship. If you were born in Northern Ireland, or have either a parent or grandparent born in Northern Ireland or The Éire, then you're eligible for a Republic of Ireland passport. This has led to hilarious backlash, such as the Belfast Passport Office running out of dual-citizenship forms on the 24th June. Anyway, this issue is incredible because it ultimately divides sovereignty of NI between London and Dublin. One solution would be border control, whether of NI, Great Britain, or Ireland.

This smugly moves on the next problem - border control. Northern Ireland cannot erect a border, since if would violate the Good Friday Agreement, and certain nationalists would have a problem with that. The Island of Great Britain could also increase their border control between itself and NI, which, amongst other issues, would seem strange between two islands of the same country. Furthermore, this doesn't stop EU citizens living in NI, or moving there, and doesn't even stop U.K. citizens from free movement into Ireland; an EU state. It could be argued, by more extreme solutionists, that Ireland should patrol and increase border security for the United Kingdom. However, considering free movement is allowed between Ireland and the rest of the EU, this is already a failed idea, without even considering if Ireland would do it or not.

The third way, a Greenland-esque division, directing a comparison from when Greenland left the EU, but Denmark didn't. This could work, but would the EU allow it? Considering Northern Ireland doesn't have the GDP, or any other of possible requirements met to join, the EU couldn't possibly allow them to join back. Furthermore, it would seem completely disrespectful to the five candidate countries that have been waiting years to join, only to see part of a country that voted to leave join back.

What possible solution, you may ask, could possibly fix this. A somewhat of a out-of-the-box and optimistic solution is to declare Northern Ireland as an overseas territory. This way, the autonomous region of NI is free to join whichever trade agreements exempt from the U.K., and also consider free movement of people with Ireland without creating too much of an issue. There is precedent, with Gibraltar and Spain, Cyprus and even smaller overseas territories in the Mediterranean from other states in Europe.

This way, with Northern Ireland as an overseas territory, NI would keep everything the unionists want such as the Queen, but also have more independence for the nationalists. It would appease the EU, since they would see it as calming tensions between states, and the U.K. would be pleased since there's no violation of the Good Friday Agreement. It's a win for every side.

Except the Scottish, but that's a far deeper issue.